tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-64468795876160188002024-03-12T16:29:03.426-07:00FAST ANNULMENT LESS EXPENSIVE... a spot where you will be able to find the answers to make your annulment easy, affordable and convenienceRosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.comBlogger40125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-46840735483796966972015-09-18T05:52:00.000-07:002017-01-26T04:03:17.909-08:00FAST RELIABLE AND CHEAPEST ANNULMENT IN THE PHILIPPINES<span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">Need legal advise? </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">Do you want your marriage null and void fast and easy ways?</span><br style="color: #333333; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;" /><br /><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">* Non-appearance hearing and reliable lawyer.</span><br style="color: #333333; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">* It would take a year only to finish the case if not complicated.</span><br style="color: #333333; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">* Php230,000 to 250,000 All in package (includes Civil registry and NSO, Psychiatrist, Filing, etc)</span><br style="color: #333333; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">--) if complicated case it would be additional cost.</span><br style="color: #333333; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;" /><br style="color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">100% Legit</span><br style="color: #333333; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">100% granted</span><br style="color: #333333; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">100% worry free</span><br style="color: #333333; font-size: 15px; line-height: 20px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">PLS CALL/TEXT via smart +639996541772 or email me at lhen10_30@yahoo.com</span></span>Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-75757569137543469572014-10-26T08:21:00.001-07:002015-09-18T05:36:18.557-07:00Fast Annulment Procedures in the Philippines <span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">Need legal advise? </span><br />
<br style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;" />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">Do you want your marriage null and void? </span><br />
<br style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;" />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">Non-appearance hearing and reliable lawyer.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">It would take 8months to 1 year only to finish the case if not complicated.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">Php180k to 220k Plus package (includes Civil registry and NSO, Psychiatrist, Filing, etc)</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">--) if complicated case it would be additional cost.</span><br />
<br style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;" />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">100% Legit</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">100% granted</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">100% worry free</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.799999237060547px;">CALL/TEXT me thru +639996541772 or email me lhen10_30@yahoo.com</span>Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com14tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-25157184325781889282012-04-13T10:23:00.001-07:002015-09-18T05:36:28.063-07:00FAST ANNULMENT IN THE PHILIPPINES - 100% LEGAL AND RELIABLE LAWYERLOOKING FOR FAST ANNULMENT YET LESS EXPENSIVE? Call/text me thru 09996541772. you can also send me an email to lhen10_30@yahoo.comRosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com29tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-40511218612574114642011-10-22T05:07:00.000-07:002011-10-22T05:11:35.009-07:00MEXICO... 2YR RENEWABLE MARRIAGE CONTRACTMexico City lawmakers want to help newlyweds avoid the hassle of divorce by giving them an easy exit strategy: temporary marriage licenses.<br /><br />Leftists in the city's assembly -- who have already riled conservatives by legalizing gay marriage -- proposed a reform to the civil code this week that would allow couples to decide on the length of their commitment, opting out of a lifetime.<br /><br />The minimum marriage contract would be for two years and could be renewed if the couple stays happy. The contracts would include provisions on how children and property would be handled if the couple splits.<br /><br />"The proposal is, when the two-year period is up, if the relationship is not stable or harmonious, the contract simply ends," said Leonel Luna, the Mexico City assemblyman who co-authored the bill.<br /><br />"You wouldn't have to go through the tortuous process of divorce," said Luna, from the leftist Party of the Democratic Revolution, which has the most seats in the 66-member chamber.<br /><br />Luna says the proposed law is gaining support and he expects a vote by the end of this year.<br /><br />Around half of Mexico City marriages end in divorce, usually in the first two years.<br /><br />The bustling capital, one of the world's largest cities, is much more liberal than the rest of the country, where the divorce rate is significantly lower although on the rise.<br /><br />Abortion is legal in Mexico City, while the Supreme Court ruled this week to uphold state laws in Baja California that say life begins at conception.<br /><br />Leftist Mayor Marcelo Ebrard, who angered the Catholic Church when he made Mexico City the first Latin American city to legalize gay marriage in late 2009, announced this month he would soon step down to run for president.<br /><br />The church criticized the proposed change.<br /><br />"This reform is absurd. It contradicts the nature of marriage," said Hugo Valdemar, spokesman for the Mexican archdiocese. "It's another one of these electoral theatrics the assembly tends to do that are irresponsible and immoral."<br /><br />The Church holds considerable sway in the country with the world's second largest Catholic population after Brazil.<br /><br />(Reporting by Alex Leff; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-14492005790379568162011-10-21T08:29:00.000-07:002011-10-21T08:33:12.526-07:00MISTRESS ESCAPE NAKED<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtAWZrKV_VVBmK5A2SRZYfr6jlxD_a_Mqm0JkI9jIQIqZy1SW77di91dEKlExmjSt91cCDlMOS2qqtjvzi1lXSWzBbt1375VYNzegyDO-GCYhTEWVwsIBS1XndK4yJZ6wytdoz0pnr40U/s1600/MISTRESS.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtAWZrKV_VVBmK5A2SRZYfr6jlxD_a_Mqm0JkI9jIQIqZy1SW77di91dEKlExmjSt91cCDlMOS2qqtjvzi1lXSWzBbt1375VYNzegyDO-GCYhTEWVwsIBS1XndK4yJZ6wytdoz0pnr40U/s320/MISTRESS.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5665968812077776562" /></a><br />JUST GOT THIS NEWS FROM A CERTAIN NEWSPAPER...<br /><br />A woman in China was recently spotted climbing out of a hotel window naked to escape her lover's angry wife.<br /><br />The incident purportedly happened on Sunday, 16 October at a hotel in Nanjing, China.<br /><br />The angry wife had supposedly heard that her husband was meeting his mistress at the hotel, and rushed to the place to catch them in the act.<br /><br />In order to avoid the furious wife, the panicked mistress resorted to climbing out of the hotel room window in the nude.<br /><br />Passersby in the street were understandably shocked at her audacity. Many people watched the woman make her escape while snapping away with their cameras.<br /><br />It is understood that the woman's lover hailed a taxi to ferry her away from the scene. Local police rushed to the scene after receiving reports of a naked woman jumping out from a window.<br /><br />Policemen met the angry wife instead, who yelled at them to come upstairs to meet her.Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-10178764082185071962010-08-24T00:00:00.000-07:002010-08-24T00:04:57.242-07:00Kris Aquino and James Yap Annulment CASEJust wanna share this informative article for those who are asking about Kris Aquino and James Yap On going annulment case... Below here the details.<br /><br />The latest development is Kris wants Baby James surname changed from Yap to Cojuangco-Aquino. Is this possible?<br /><br />When Baby James was born, there was a presumption of legitimacy, that since Kris and James got married, and Baby James was the product of such a union, his birth status was presumed legitimate. The very fact that the alleged father, James Yap, signed his birth certificate shows that Baby James earned the right to bear his father's surname, which is customary in Philippine civil law. (Legitimate children bear the surname of their legitimate father).<br /><br />Baby James' status rests in the legitimacy of the marriage between Kris and James Yap. The question now is---is the marriage of Kris and James legal? Kris claims that it was not. James countered and said it is. Let us review both sides' argument.<br /><br />Kris claims that their first marriage certificate states that they were married in Quezon City and the civil ceremony was officiated by Mayor Sonny Belmonte. However, it turned out, it was not Belmonte who officiated the marriage, but a Protestant minister.<br /><br />Under our Family Code, for a marriage to be legitimate, it has to follow certain requisites, namely:<br /><br />1. The people involved in the marriage are legally permitted to enter into contractual obligations, since a marriage is a contract.<br />2. The marriage was solemnized by someone authorized by law or by custom<br />3. The marriage took place within the period allowed by law, as stated in a marriage license procured prior to the marriage ceremony.<br />4. The people involved in the marriage are not barred by law to enter into it. Meaning, they are not married to some one else prior to the marriage.<br /><br />Kris alleged that the solemnizing officer was not authorized by law to marry them, since the alleged pastor was actually a Protestant preacher. Under the law, in order for a minister to be allowed to marry someone, he has to be the head of the religious group or sect where the couple belonged. Kris and James are Catholics. Therefore, the preacher has no authority over them.<br /><br />Some civil law professors say, this is not a very strong case to grant an annulment since this is a mere irregularity. Others, however, say, it is material and could affect the outcome of the marriage, since the marriage should be solemnized by someone cloaked with authority.<br /><br />Granting, however, that this civil ceremony was a sham, then, says James Yap, it was actually cured by the second marriage contracted between him and Kris shortly afterwards. Now, it remains to be seen if that second marriage was contracted with a valid marriage license. The first marriage license for the first marriage does not apply to the second marriage ceremony, since under the law, a license applies only to one marriage. If both did not secure a marriage license for the second marriage ceremony, it is deemed void ab initio or void from the very beginning.<br /><br />Now, what if the marriage between Kris and James was indeed, void from the beginning, what is the effect of such a marriage to the birth status of Baby James?<br /><br />Of course, Baby James is deemed illegitimate and must bear the surname of the mother, until the age of 18 years old, where he is then asked if he wants to bear the surname of his father. Under the law authored by Senator Ramon Bong Revilla, illegitimate children now enjoy the same rights as legitimate children, and one of them, the right to bear the surname of his biological father. The father should consent to it by affixing his signature in the birth certificate of the child. If there is no consent, then, the child bears the surname of his legal custodian, which, in this case, is his biological mother until he reaches maturity. When he reaches maturity, it is all up to him if he chooses to retain using his mother's surname or elect to change it and bear the surname of his father.<br /><br />Now, how about the regime of property governing the relationship of Kris and James? Does the absolute conjugal property exists in their case or that of the regime of property gains?<br /><br />Under our Civil Code, the right property regime that governs the marriage of Kris and James is that of co-ownership property regime realized under Article 147 of the Family Code. Under such a property regime, all the fruits of their labor during the time of their marriage shall be presumed to have been jointly contributed.<br /><br />If reports are true that during the marriage between Kris and Yap, more than 200 million pesos were generated from the said relationship, then, the amount will actually be partitioned in equal shares, 50% or 100 million to Kris and 100 million to James Yap. The partition of the said property shall commence shortly after the grant of a court decision annulling their marriage. That is, if there is no pre-nuptial agreement between the two.<br /><br />GRanting, for the sake of argument, that there was a pre-nup, will this govern the property relations of the two during the marriage? No. A pre-nup takes effect only if there is a consummation of a marriage. Since there was no consummation, and the presumption of law is that there was cohabitation without the benefit of marriage, then, Article 147 of the Family Code applies. Kris has to agree to partition the property regime between her and James Yap. <br /><br />Source: http://newphilrevolution.blogspot.com/2010/08/case-of-kris-aquino-james-yap-annulment.htmlRosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-55998875061300116172009-09-11T19:57:00.001-07:002009-09-11T20:01:55.846-07:00Gayness not reason to annul marriage -- Supreme CourtI wanted to share what I have read from the particular Philippines daily Inquirer by Jerome Aning.<br /> <br />Filed Under: Laws, Justice & Rights, Gender Issues, Human Rights, Family<br /><br />MANILA, Philippines -- Being gay is not a valid ground to have one's marriage annulled; hiding such a fact is.<br /><br />The Supreme Court made this ruling as it reversed a decision by the Las Piñas City Regional Trial Court to annul a couple's 11-year marriage after the wife claimed her husband was a homosexual.<br /><br />In a 21-page ruling dated August 28, the Court's 3rd Division said the lower court erred in declaring the marriage void from the start because it took into account solely the husband's alleged homosexuality without being presented with proof that he had concealed it from his wife.<br />In restoring the marriage of the couple (whose identities the Inquirer is withholding for the sake of their minor children), the Court said the lower court misinterpreted Article 46 of the Family Code of the Philippines that allows annulment when the consent of either party is obtained by fraud, such as concealment of homosexuality.<br /><br />“Nowhere in the [RTC's] decision was it proven by preponderance of evidence that [the husband] was homosexual at the onset of his marriage and that he deliberately hid such a fact from his wife. It is the concealment that vitiates the consent of the innocent party [and] presupposes bad faith and intent to defraud the other party in giving consent to the marriage,” said the Supreme Court’s ruling, written by Justice Ruben Reyes.<br /><br />Court records showed the wife sued for annulment, accusing her husband of being psychologically incapacitated to perform his marital obligations. The couple, both medical practitioners, were sweethearts for three years before getting married in 1989.<br />During the trial, the wife described her husband as a “harsh disciplinarian, unreasonably meticulous, and easily angered," adding his alleged cruelty to their children was a cause of their fights. She also complained that he showed lavish affection to his mother and was dependent on the latter's decisions.<br />Further adding to her woe s was his alleged homosexuality. She said she was suspicious about his “peculiar closeness to male companions.” She also said she caught him manifesting affection to a male caller, found several pornographic homosexual materials in his possession, and saw him kissing another man on the lips.<br />When she confronted him, he denied everything. She decided to leave their conjugal home and took their children with her. He then stopped giving support to their children.<br /><br />The wife presented in the trial a clinical psychologist who interviewed the husband and their children and reached the same conclusion that he was truly psychologically incapacitated.<br /><br />The husband, for his part, denied all his wife's allegations, adding that their marriage was “generally harmonious” so he was surprised by the suit.<br />He said he never maltreated their children. He added that he was close to his mother because she was already growing old and there was nothing wrong to return the love and affection of the one who reared and looked after him.<br /><br />He claimed his wife’s jealousy drove him to avoid female friends but instead his wife used this to “conjure” stories about his sexual preferences. He also denied kissing another man or owning homosexual pornographic magazines and videotapes.<br />He countered that the true cause of his wife's hostility was his decision to convert his lying-in clinic into a hospital that competed with the one owned by his wife's family.<br /><br />The lower court judge, siding with the wife, declared the marriage null and void in 2005. The husband's share of the conjugal property was forfeited in favor his children, to whom he was also ordered to give monthly financial support.<br />The Supreme Court, however, disagreed with the ruling, saying the judge erroneously considered the public perception of the husband's sexual preference without corroboration of witnesses.<br /><br />Also, the judge took cognizance of the husband's peculiarities and interpreted it against his sexuality.<br /><br />“What [the wife] attempted to demonstrate were [her husband's] homosexual tendencies by citing overt acts generally predominant among homosexual individuals. She wanted to prove that the perceived homosexuality rendered [him] incapable of fulfilling essential marital obligations,” the Court ruled.<br /><br />The high court said Article 46 of the Family Code clearly showed that concealment of homosexuality was among the circumstances constituting fraud for which a marriage may be annulled.<br /><br />“Concealment in this case is not simply a blanket denial but one that is constitutive of fraud. It is this fundamental element that [the wife] failed to prove. The burden of proof to show the nullity of the marriage rests on [her]. Sadly, she failed to discharge this onus,” the high court said.<br />Unlike in the United States where homosexuality is a basis for divorce, the high court said that homosexuality is only a ground for legal separation in the Philippines.<br /><br />“The Court is mindful of the constitutional policy to protect and strengthen the family as the basic autonomous social institution and marriage as the foundation of the family. The State and the public have vital interest in the maintenance and preservation of these social institutions against desecration by fabricated evidence. Thus, any doubt should be resolved in favor of the validity of marriage,” the high court said.<br /><br />The Court also berated the husband's lawyer for filing a petition to annul judgment of the RTC before the Court of Appeals, instead of an ordinary appeal. When the appeals court denied the petition because of the wrong remedy, the husband elevated the case to the Supreme Court.<br /><br />The Court said it found it “prudent” to relax the rules and allowed the case to prosper by entertaining it as a certiorari petition, so that the parties may attain the ends of justice.Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-45096514946178588612009-08-30T06:53:00.000-07:002009-08-30T06:55:30.841-07:00FAST ANNULMENT RESULTAre YOU looking for Worry Free and Fast Annulment Result? IF THIS WOULD BE YOUR LAST RESORT You know where to go... I can really help you find the best Lawyer in Town. <br /><br />So stop worrying about the Past where you could really make a step forward and start a new LIFE with the One you truly Love… your Soul mate is just roaming around. Look for the best Partner in Life as still there is a new hope for everyone.<br /><br />Everybody Deserves to be Happy!Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com19tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-77918150542057315362009-07-15T22:28:00.000-07:002009-07-15T22:39:39.826-07:00WHEN LOVE DISAPPEARS FROM MARRIAGEMr, Jorge C. Bocobo, former Dean of the University of the Philippines, College of Law, from 1917 to 1934 said that once love disappears from marriage, the dark reality of matrimonial dissolution rudely interrupts the lives of couples and sets the stage for a legal tug-of-war. He also notes that some women who favor divorse could be described by the Spanish Poet in these lines:<br /><br /><strong>SPANISH POET</strong><br />Te amaré diosa Venus si prefieres<br />que te ame mucho tiempo y con cordura<br />y respondió la diosa de Citeres:<br />Prefiero como todas las mujeres<br />que me amen poco tiempo y con locura.<br />Te amaré diosa Venus, te amaré.<br /><br /><strong>ENGLISH TRANSLATION</strong> <br /> I will love you, Divine Venus, if you desire <br /> that I love you eternally and with discretion. <br /> The goddess of Cythera replied to me:<br /> I prefer, as all women do, <br /> that you love me for a short time and passionately. <br /> I will love you, Divine Venus, I will love you.<br /><br />In other words, the woman who favors divorse says, I prefer like all women do, to be loved briefly but with madness. A tagalog proverb says... ANG UNA ay NAGSISISI KUMAKARIMOT ANG HULI, it means that Those who are already married are repenting and others are in a hurry to get hitched.Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-44832273284918793882009-06-24T21:01:00.000-07:002009-06-24T21:10:28.729-07:00VOID MARRIAGES in the PHILIPPINESA void marriage is one that has no legal effect and is invalid because it has not complied with the formal or essential requirements of the law for valid marriages.<br /><br />Void Marriages in the Philippines are as follows:<br /><br />1. Marriages without a marriage license.<br />2. Marriages without a marriage ceremony.<br />3. Marriages officiated by a person without any legal authority to solemnize marriages.<br />4. Marriages in which the contracting parties lack the legal capacity to contract a marriage (below 18 yrs old).<br />5. Marriages between two persons of the same sex.<br />6. Marriages that are incestuous and those that are against public policy.<br />7. Marriages that are bigamous and polygamous.<br />8. Marriages that are contracted through mistake by one party as to the identity of the other.<br />9. Marriages that are subsequently contracted after the previous marriage has been annuled or declared void and the annulment judgment, partition, distribution of the properties of the and the delivery of the children's presumptive legitimate were not recorded in the civil registry.<br />10. Marriages in which at least one of the parties is Psychologically incapacitated.Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-52044359646699136212009-06-15T17:22:00.000-07:002009-06-15T17:30:27.804-07:00ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN: DO THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO SUPPORT?Under the old rules, Articles 278 and 291, Civil Code), before illegitimate children could be entitled to support and successional rights, it is paramount that they have been recognized or acknowledged first by their parents. <br /><br />But under the new rules, Article 195, Family Code, the different categories of illegitimate children have been eliminated. Children now come in just two varities- legitimate and illegitimate. The elimination of the category of "acknowledged natural children" carries the implication that recognition or acknowledgment is no longer needed to entitle illegitimate children to receive support from their parents. It appears that proof of filiation (paternity or family relationship)is enough to collect support for all illegitimate children.Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-26877992804595210492009-05-26T23:31:00.000-07:002009-05-26T23:47:16.904-07:00AIKO MELENDEZ AND MARTIN JICKAIN ANNULMENT CASEI got this news from GMANews.TV and stated below how Coun. Aiko Melendez filed an Annulment of her Marriage to Martin Jickain. It happened almost 2 years ago. Just wanted to share what I have read...<br /><br />Actress and Quezon City Councilor Aiko Melendez has sought the annulment of her marriage with model Martin Jickain, barely two months since their separation last September OF 2007.<br /><br />The Quezon City Regional Trial Court is set to raffle on Friday afternoon the petition filed by Melendez seeking the annulment of her nearly two-year marriage with Jickain.<br /><br />The court refused to reveal the grounds cited by the councilor in her petition for nullity of marriage, citing the confidentiality of the petition being a family matter.<br /><br />Two months ago, Melendez was granted a temporary protection order (TPO) to keep Martin away from her and their one-year old daughter.<br /><br />Melendez reportedly cited physical abuse and Jickain’s relationship with another woman as grounds for her TPO petition. Jickain has since denied that a "third party" was involved in their break-up.<br /><br />Shortly after the court approved the TPO, Melendez last October 26 filed a permanent protection order (PPO) against Jickain, which remains pending in court.<br /><br />Meanwhile, a source disclosed that the reasons cited by Melendez in her annulment petition were almost the same as the ones that were used to justify her earlier TPO and PPO petitions.<br /><br />Jickain and Melendez were married in 2005, following the annulment of Melendez’s marriage with actor Jomari Yllana several years ago.Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-2696619305362442872009-05-20T18:46:00.000-07:002009-05-20T18:59:59.468-07:00AMALIA FUENTES AND JOEY STEVENS - ANNULMENT CHRONICLEAmalia Fuentes, husband agree to split...i got this article from daily inquirer and it tells the story how the annulment process of Amalia Fuentes being Processed and done...<br /><br />CEBU, Philippines -- An emotional Amalia Fuentes faced the court Tuesday to answer a petition for marriage annulment filed by her estranged husband Joey Stevens.<br /><br />Although the 62-year-old movie icon did not shed tears, her 24-year-old son Gerard was teary-eyed as his mother narrated in court how her relationship with her spouse turned sour.<br /><br />She accused her husband --who appeared calm and smiling throughout the pre-trial hearing at a Mandaue City court -- of having an illicit affair with a woman from a prominent clan in Cebu.<br /><br />"He was with a woman openly. They are showing themselves in public blatantly," said Fuentes, whose real name is Amalia Muhlach-Stevens, as she glanced at Joey and pointed her finger at him on several occasions during the trial.<br /><br />It was a sight not often seen -- at least for court employees -- as a celebrity trial does not normally occur in Mandaue City.<br /><br />Court employees crowded at the lobby, awaiting Fuentes and her celebrity daughter Liezl Martinez.<br /><br />Thirty minute after the two-hour pre-trial began, Regional Trial Court Judge Teresita Galanida ordered everyone -- except for the couple, Liezl and Gerard -- to leave the courtroom, saying "sensitive issues" were to be discussed.<br /><br />When the courtroom was again opened to the public about 40 minutes afterwards, a compromise had been reached between the couple: Joey would withdraw the annulment petition after Amalia filed a separate petition for legal separation in Manila.<br /><br />After the trial, Joey hurriedly went out of the Mandaue City Hall of Justice building, avoiding interviews from the media.<br /><br />While waiting for his car, Joey was asked whether he still had feelings for his wife. He replied: "No comment."<br /><br />Amalia, in a separate interview after the trial, reiterated her claim that Joey was having an affair with a woman "who is much richer than me."<br /><br />Joey filed an annulment case against Amalia 28 years after they wed on August 10, 1979. According to his lawyer Rolindo Navarro, the grounds for the annulment petition they filed in July 2007 include psychological incapacity.<br /><br />"Sometimes, even when my client [Joey] plays golf, she will not even allow him to do so. At his age, he is entitled to have fun [referring to a game of golf]," lawyer Rolindo Navarro said.<br /><br />The husband's lawyer also said that the marriage between Amalia and Joey in 1979 was null and void because the divorce between his first wife (a certain Olondez) in the United States had no legal bearing in the Philippines based on the 1950 civil code. "The Family Code took effect after 1987," Navarro explained.<br /><br />Amalia's lawyer Redemberto Villanueva, on the other hand, said the 1979 marriage was binding. He also questioned the lack of technical requirements for the petition. He said that there was no definite support for claiming psychological incapacity.<br /><br />Villanueva also said that they also questioned the filing of the case in<br />Mandaue City, far from both Amalia and Joey's residence. But Navarro replied in a separate interview that Joey has been living in North Town homes in Cubacub, Mandaue City since December last year.<br /><br />"It's so difficult for me to come down here because I am a very busy woman. The last time I was here was seven years ago. The only good that came of this case was that I was able to see your beautiful city," said Amalia who was already smiling in interviews after the hearing.<br /><br />Fuentes, who became famous in the 1960s as a movie actor, stood confidently after she, as a respondent, was asked to say her piece in court.<br /><br />She said she was loyal to her husband for 28 years but took exception to the petition for "disrespect" because it named her as Amalia Amador Muhlach instead of Amalia Muhlach-Stevens.<br /><br />"I carried your name with dignity, with honor, with loyalty. I was loyal to you and now he's calling me Muhlach. This is my maiden name. He just wants to shame me. This is a way of shaming me," said Amalia as her son Gerard patted her arms as if to calm her down.<br /><br />"I am still Mrs. Amalia Stevens whether you like it or not, whether you have another Mrs. Stevens in mind, I am right now your Mrs. Stevens...Joey."<br /><br />Amalia also said in court that she had been receiving death threats allegedly coming from her husband after she granted interviews with the media in Manila. As a result, she said she filed a separate petition for temporary protection order (TPO) against her husband.<br /><br />The case is still ongoing at a Manila court, said Amalia.<br /><br />"It is so hurtful and painful that a man I have respected would show me this kind of disrespect," she added.<br /><br />While Amalia was speaking in court, her husband was seen shaking his head and smirking.Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-65197290851616938942009-05-06T22:58:00.000-07:002009-05-06T23:26:13.726-07:00IS ABANDONMENT AND INFIDELITY GROUNDS FOR ANNULMENT?No... An annulment is only available if there was mistake or someone committed fraud at the time of marriage. What happens *after* you are married has nothing to do with it. Too many people misunderstand this. I get lots of questions from people who have problems after the marriage and think that they can get an annulment. Problems arise and people change their minds and it doesn't mean you can get an annulment. Failure to live up to expectations after marriage is not grounds for an annulment.<br /><br />An annulment can be contested by either party, which is why it is important to have proof of the grounds for the annulment based on ARTICLE 36, FAMILY CODE(PSYCHOLOGICAL INCAPACITY. Therefore, Infidelity, abandonment and abuse are not grounds for annulment. You can talk or discuss this matter to your family lawyer for any further details for your clarification and understanding on the issue provided here.Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-87899286579982692602009-04-14T18:37:00.000-07:002009-04-14T18:44:10.827-07:00ANNULMENT PROCEDURE IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCHAnnulment is a thorny issue for many Catholics and widely misunderstood outside the Church. In this Update, we’ll take a look at questions that commonly arise and how the Church addresses them. When it comes to how annulments are handled, it’s important to keep in mind that practices may vary slightly from one diocese to the next, but the overall rules of the Church are the same. The doctrine of marriage is that of the universal Church. The Church’s practices around marriage and annulment are aimed at protecting the sacrament of marriage, in order to help Catholics live a fully sacramental life.<br /><br />The Catholic Church presumes that marriages are valid, binding spouses for life. When couples do separate and divorce, therefore, the Church examines in detail their marriage to determine if, right from the start, some essential element was missing in their relationship. If that fact has been established, it means the spouses did not have the kind of marital link that binds them together for life.<br /><br />The Church then issues a declaration of nullity (an annulment) and both are free to marry again in the Catholic Church.<br /><br />1. On what grounds does the Church declare nullity for some failed marriages?<br /><br />In technical language, the most common reasons are insufficiency or inadequacy of judgment (also known as lack of due discretion, due to some factor such as young age, pressure to marry in haste, etc.), psychological incapacity, and absence of a proper intention to have children, be faithful, or remain together until death.<br /><br />These grounds can manifest themselves in various ways. For example, a couple, discovering her pregnancy, decide to marry; only much later do they recognize the lack of wisdom in that decision. Or one spouse carries an addictive problem with alcohol or drugs into the marriage. Perhaps a person, unfaithful during courtship, continues the infidelity after marrying.<br /><br />In cases like these, the Church judges may decide that something contrary to the nature of marriage or to a full, free human decision prevents this contract from being sound or binding.<br /><br />I begin this formal annulment process at the parish level for about a dozen petitioners each year. My suggestion to them as they approach the multi-page, perhaps daunting questionnaire moves along these lines:<br /><br />“As you reflect upon the marriage, ask yourself: Was there something missing right from the start, something radically wrong from day one? Before the wedding, were there warning signals, red flags which you may have dismissed simply as the cold-feet anxieties rather common for couples prior to a nuptial service? Did you suffer deep difficulties early in your marital life and worry about them, but, never having been married before, judged they were merely the expected burdensome part of marriage? Now, perhaps years later, you view them as symptomatic of a much more serious problem, a radical malfunctioning in your relationship.”<br /><br />2. Why must a divorced Catholic complete a complicated Church annulment process before remarrying? <br /><br />Jesus himself had strong words about marriage. The Catholic Church believes it has a responsibility to follow the words of Christ, both in teaching and in practice. Jesus gave a quite blunt answer to those who raised the issue of marriage and divorce. In the Gospel of Mark (10:11-12) he declared: “Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her; and the woman who divorces her husband and marries another commits adultery.”<br /><br />In the Gospel of Luke (16:18), written after the Gospel of Mark, Jesus’ declaration is almost identical: “Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery. The man who marries a woman divorced from her husband likewise commits adultery.”<br /><br />During the exchange recorded by Mark, Christ referred to words from the Old Testament Book of Genesis: “At the beginning of creation God made them male and female: for this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and the two shall become as one. They are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore let no man separate what God has joined” (Mark 10:6-9). Most if not all Scripture scholars today maintain that these were Christ’s original words.<br /><br />The complicated process of annulment then is a response to the strength of this teaching. The Church presumes that marriages are binding and lifelong. The annulment process helps to determine if something essential was missing from the couple’s relationship from the beginning that prevented the sacramental union that the couple promised to each other.<br /><br />3. How can you require an intended spouse who is not a Catholic to endure this annulment process? <br /><br /><br />In simplest terms, if a Catholic wishes to marry in the Church when there has been a previous marriage, then either one of the partners in the earlier union must have died or the Church must have issued a declaration of nullity, an annulment of that previous marriage. Why is this so?<br /><br />The Catholic Church views all marriages with respect. It presumes that they are true or valid. Thus, it considers the marriages, for example, of two Protestant, Jewish or even nonbelieving persons to be binding in the eyes of God, unions covered by the words of Christ about divorce. Consequently, it requires a Church annulment process to establish that an essential ingredient in the relationship was missing from the start of the previous marriage.<br /><br />Such a requirement often represents an unpleasant challenge to Protestant, Jewish or nonbelieving persons who wish to marry a Catholic after the civil termination of a previous marriage. They may have no difficulty with remarriage after divorce and even feel resentful about the prospects of a Roman Catholic formal annulment procedure.<br /><br />I would never try to explain or resolve this thorny and emotional issue over the telephone, but only face-to-face. The explanations above may help to clarify the issue, but negative feelings often remain. After hearing their often painful stories and explaining the Church’s procedures, I offer a comment along these lines: “The only reason you would go through this process is out of love for your prospective marriage partner. Without the annulment, marriage in the Church is not validly possible. This is a prospect that will trouble your intended spouse now and in the future. For you to complete the procedure would be a great act of self-giving love.”<br /><br />4. Who else besides the couple seeking a declaration of nullity will be questioned during the annulment process?<br /><br />The ex-spouse or respondent will need to be contacted, but not necessarily by the spouse or petitioner seeking the annulment. The diocesan tribunal office will make that written contact with the ex-spouse, with the name and address provided by the petitioner.<br /><br />The respondent’s cooperation is welcome, but not essential. Simple justice, however, requires that an ex-spouse at least be made aware that the petitioner is seeking an annulment and that the respondent may be part of the procedure. It is only fair that both persons have an opportunity to present their sides of the marriage.<br /><br />In formal cases the petitioner needs to supply the names and addresses of several people who are familiar with the petitioner’s earlier marriage. They must be able and willing to complete a brief questionnaire about the petitioner’s earlier marriage.<br /><br />Many years ago, a man approached me about an annulment because his wife had left him, moved to San Francisco and was living the life of a “flower child,” a 1960s phenomenon. As the process progressed, the tribunal sent her the standard letter of announcement with an invitation to participate. There was no response. The office followed up with a registered letter to her. The post office returned the letter with a notation, “Refused.” His case then proceeded to a successful conclusion, and the tribunal granted the desired annulment. The petitioner and the tribunal had done all they could to solicit the input of the ex-spouse.<br /><br />5. Does an annulment make the children illegitimate?<br /><br />No. The parents, now divorced, presumably once obtained a civil license and entered upon a legal marriage. Children from that union are, therefore, their legitimate offspring. Legitimate means “legal.” The civil divorce and the Church annulment do not alter this situation. Nor do they change the parents’ responsibility toward the children. In fact, during annulment procedures the Church reminds petitioners of their moral obligation to provide for the proper upbringing of their children.<br /><br />Nevertheless, persons pondering the Catholic annulment process do often express this concern about the legitimacy of the children after that procedure. It’s a persistent rumor.<br /><br />6. Is money involved in the annulment process?<br /><br />No and yes. Money does not affect the speed of the procedure or its successful completion. Nor does the inability of a petitioner to share part of the costs of the process interfere with the possibility of obtaining an annulment. Diocesan tribunals make special arrangements for people.<br /><br />There are obviously extensive costs involved in maintaining an agency for annulment procedures. The annual budget of our tribunal exceeds $150,000 and covers items like rental space, salaries, office equipment and supplies. Income from annulment fees covers most but not all of these expenses.<br /><br />There is a certain value, too, in the petitioners sharing part of this procedure’s cost. Similarly, it’s considered good practice to expect counseling clients to pay for counseling, or to expect college students to work for some portion of their financial aid. Paying something can help one develop a personal commitment to the process.<br /><br />Some Case Studies <br /><br />7. Joe, a lifelong Catholic, had a miserable first marriage that ended in divorce. He now seeks to marry Joannah, who is Catholic too, but has never married. They are deeply in love and want a Catholic wedding. What if Joe’s previous marriage was “outside the Church,” say, by a justice of the peace? <br /><br />The Church requires that a baptized Roman Catholic marry before one of its representatives, usually a priest or deacon, unless special permission was granted otherwise. When a Catholic does not observe this requirement and marries “out of the Church,” and eventually divorces, the annulment process involves two steps.<br /><br />The first is securing the Catholic’s baptismal record, a copy of an official document indicating the location of the marriage and the person who performed the ceremony, and the divorce papers. The second is completing a relatively brief form that seeks the above information and asks a few additional questions about circumstances concerning the celebration of the marriage.<br /><br />This form and the supporting documents showing who witnessed the wedding are sent to the bishop’s office or, more specifically, his diocesan marriage tribunal. It ordinarily processes the application in a few days and returns the petitioner an annulment or declaration of nullity based on the “lack of canonical form.” The individual is now free to pursue subsequent marriage within the Church.<br /><br />8-9. What if Joe, for his first wedding years ago, had sought permission from the diocese to be married at his first wife’s Protestant Church? Or what if Joe’s first wedding had occurred in a Catholic church, before a priest or deacon?<br /><br />In the first case, the situation of special permission generally occurs when one of the persons seeking to marry is not a Catholic and, for good reasons, wishes to wed in her or his own Church and by her or his own clergyperson. During my 45 years in priestly ministry, I have participated in many of these arrangements.<br /><br />Sometimes it meant standing next to the minister during the ceremony in his church; at other times, I stood by the side of a rabbi in a restaurant or hotel; at still others I even assisted as a judge conducted the service in a home. Occasionally I was not present at the ceremony, but only completed in advance the necessary paperwork.<br /><br />In all of these circumstances, however, I met with the couple ahead of time, filled out the required documentation and petitioned the bishop for a dispensation from canonical form (marriage in the presence of a bishop, priest or deacon and two witnesses). This special permission allowed the Catholic to marry before a minister, rabbi or even a judge according to the desires of the other party in the marriage.<br /><br />In these cases where the first marriage was either a Catholic wedding or a non-Catholic wedding with special permission to be married before someone other than an ordained Catholic minister, the annulment process is more involved.<br /><br />The annulment process in these circumstances, termed a formal case, examines not so much where the marriage took place, but what happened in the marriage. The procedure takes longer (six months to a year, or more, depending upon the diocese) and is more complex than the “lack of form” annulment mentioned in question seven above. The Church in these cases researches not merely the location of a wedding, but also the relationship between spouses before and during the marriage. That’s a bit more complicated.<br /><br />A fact sheet covering the basic details of the failed marriage begins the formal case procedure. However, the practice in the United States is that a person may start the process only after obtaining a legal divorce that terminated the marital relationship under civil law. The petitioning individual then works through an extensive printed inquiry that explores the childhood of both persons, their courtship, the early years of the marriage and what the petitioner considers the major cause for the marital breakup.<br /><br />The petitioner will likewise need to secure certain official documents—proof of Baptism, if pertinent, a marriage record and the divorce papers—and provide names and addresses of the former spouse(s) as well as several witnesses who could share their observations and experiences of the courtship and marriage.<br /><br />Once all the materials have been assembled, the diocesan tribunal examines the case, usually interviews the petitioner, often seeks the counsel of a psychologist or therapist, and makes a decision. The office then sends its initial judgment to a different tribunal for confirmation. The Syracuse Diocese, where I live and minister, for example, normally refers its cases to the Interdiocesan Tribunal of New York, an agency which covers all of New York state.<br /><br />If both tribunals agree that there are sufficient grounds (see question 1) for an annulment, the diocesan tribunal communicates a declaration of nullity to the petitioner. Respondents who are interested and who have cooperated in the process are also notified about the declaration of nullity. <br /><br />Sometimes cases receive a negative response, or petitions for an annulment are rejected. It is probably safe to say that a majority of formal cases in the United States receive positive judgments and the annulments are granted.<br /><br />The Positive Results of Seeking a Declaration <br /><br />10. What are the benefits of annulments?<br /><br />The first benefit, of course, is that the petitioners may now celebrate a marriage in the Catholic Church or have an existing marriage “blessed” or recognized with the Church. There can, however, be a deeper and much more spiritual benefit.<br /><br />Divorce is a kind of death experience, with the grieving that normally accompanies life’s end. Thus a divorced person may know the typical grief feelings or conditions of denial, anger, bargaining, sadness and acceptance. But divorce in some ways is worse than death. It can involve rejection and self-doubts. The divorced person may ponder questions like, “Why me?” or “What did I do wrong?” or “How did I fail?” There also may be resentment toward the ex-spouse.<br /><br />The thorough reflection, writing and discussion with trained Church ministers involved in the annulment process, while often revisiting painfully sensitive areas, can ultimately help heal wounds and bring about closure. The petitioner may view the overall past marriage in a new light, let go of hurts or doubts and move on to a new, more productive and more peaceful life...<br /><br />Courtesy of http://www.americancatholic.org/newsletters/cu/ac1002.aspRosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-85900712819855485662009-04-02T01:19:00.000-07:002009-04-02T01:24:56.735-07:00IS DECLARATION OF NULLITY OF MARRIAGE DIFFERENT FROM ANNULMENT?YES... Annulment is a legal procedure for declaring a marriage null and void. Unlike divorce, it is retroactive: an annulled marriage is considered never to have existed.<br /><br />In strict legal terminology, annulment refers only to making a voidable marriage null; if the marriage is void ab initio, then it is automatically null, although a legal declaration of nullity is required to establish this. It applies to marriages that are void or invalid from the very beginning. In other words, it was never valid in the first place. The process of obtaining such a declaration is similar to the annulment process. Generally speaking, annulment, despite its retrospective nature, still results in any children born being considered legitimate in the United States and many other countries.Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-26924254590070230642009-03-25T03:52:00.000-07:002009-05-02T02:44:33.433-07:00LOTLOT DE LEON AND RAMON CHRISTOPHER ANNULMENT RESULT - - - MARRIAGE DECLARED NULL AND VOIDThe Marriage of Ramon “Monching” Christopher De Leon and Lotlot De Leon for almost 19years has ended on May 01, 2008 as the RTC-Quezon City Regional Trial Court declared their Marriage null and void. This is because they were underage when they got married last March 27, 1989.<br /><br />Lotlot De Leon filed an annulment case against Ramon Christopher De Leon by the reason of irreconcilable differences. <br /><br />When Lotlot received the verdict of their annulment from her lawyer she felt so happy and for her… "When I got the call from my lawyer, I am really surprised. But there is a misconception that people experiencing the same situation should be happy... for me it was mixed emotions.”<br /><br />She added that she was not that proud of what happened to their marriage because of their children. She admitted that it is not that simple for their children to cope up from what is happening. Just like the other couple around who experienced the same sort of problems, there is still a lesson that leaves us behind and teaches us from what we have experienced.<br /><br />The actress said that she is now happy and contented because the respect that monching gave her is the most important and the guidance and proper care as well that her partner is now sharing with their children. <br /><br />Lotlot informed the kids about the court’s decision and she was also the one who called monching and informed him about the decision of their annulment.Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-770668338650490292009-03-16T21:59:00.000-07:002009-03-16T22:00:15.829-07:00CHILD VISITATION RIGHTSThe law encourages parents to spend as much time and contact with their children. While the action for annulment or declaration of nullity of marriage is pending in court or still on going, you still have the legal right to see or visit your child/children anytime you wanted to. <br /><br />If the visitation turns out to be detrimental to the best interests of the child, the court may step in and terminate visitation rights.Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-28350071585420792882009-03-05T20:49:00.000-08:002009-05-06T00:44:37.780-07:00DIETHER OCAMPO's MARRIAGE to KRISTINE HERMOSA - DECLARED NULL AND VOIDDiether Ocampo’s Marriage to Kristine Hermosa has been declared null and void from the beginning by the Court Of Appeal. Abante Newspaper dated February 11, 2009, has published the most popular issue of annulment between these two celebrities.<br /><br />As far as we remember, Kristine primarily filed the annulment of her marriage to Diether Ocampo last June 21, 2005. She argued that a marriage was not given during the marriage ceremony that was solemnized by Mayor Antonio Esquivel last September <br />21, 2004 in Jaen, Nueva Ecija. <br /><br />After more than two years of fighting and waiting for her annulment case finally has been served and…. finally granted. <br /><br />…The Court of Appeal explained also that the Absence of a Marriage certificate, being an essential element for the marriage to be valid, rendered the marriage null and void from the beginning. <br />Court of Appeal added that the absence of the primary requisites is a vital element to prove the marriage between two persons. It also elucidated that the marriage of Diether and Kristine has been invalid from the beginning.<br /><br />A part of the decision read: “The absence of any of the essential or formal requisites shall render the marriage void from the beginning. It is a Hornbook doctrine that findings of the facts of trial courts are entitled to great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed except for strong and valid reasons.”Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-1854127537475506852009-03-04T02:19:00.000-08:002009-03-04T17:44:40.183-08:00SPOUSAL SUPPORT LAWYER... Looking for <em>SPOUSAL SUPPORT LAWYER</em>? My lawyer is also handling this kind of case. If you have the same sort of problem like Mendoza v. Parungao Case 49 Phil. 271, I can refer you to my lawyer. <br /><br />In most cases, spousal support ceases when the marriage is annulled or declared void by the court. It has ended upon the remarriage of the other spouse. But if the action is not dissolve the marriage and the marriage is still valid and subsisting, spousal support is usually granted to allow the wife to become self-supporting at a standard of living reasonably comparable to the one she enjoyed during the marriage. A valid marriage is necessary for spousal support to have a legal foundation.<br /><br />Spousal Support and a valid marriage are co-terminous. Once the final judgment granting the petition of annulment of marriage the obligation of mutual support between the spouses ceases according to <strong>ARTICLE 198, Family Code</strong>. Once the marriage has been declared void or annulled, the duty to provide spousal support also ends based on the case of <strong>Mendoza v. Parungao, 49 Phil. 271</strong>.Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-56668972876080657552009-02-27T04:23:00.000-08:002009-02-27T04:28:04.756-08:00WHO SHOULD HAVE CUSTODY OF YOUR CHILD?The Court system investigates every parent and decides what environment would be the best for the child if each of them is asking for sole custody of the child. But most of the cases the full custody of the child is with his mother and will just grant the father for part time visitation according to his time and availability. However, there are some cases that the mother is not qualified to raise his child due to some procedural reason and only his father has granted with full custody of the child. The court system will award with the child to see if there is a first choice in where he would like to live. It is always depend upon the situation. <br /><br />If you would like to know more about this issue, my lawyer has a full knowledge about CHILD CUSTODY CASE and I can refer you to him. <br /><br />Getting back your child has no corresponding price and to be with him is worth living for... :)Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-12474925172736138382009-02-25T02:38:00.000-08:002012-06-03T00:30:41.461-07:00ANNULMENT AND DIVORCE IN THE PHILIPPINESDivorce is not acknowledged by the Philippine Laws and it is the act of breaking off marriage ties due to different factors. <br />
Divorce allows people to dissolve their marriage simply because they really wanted out of the relationship and enter a new one after all.<br />
Divorce is basically being married first and then breaking up because it did not work out well…<br />
Annulment is proving that the marriage is not real or legal due to different factors which make their marriage void from the beginning. Or if legally married, has to prove that one person in their marriage is psychologically incapacitated to grant the annulment.<br />
Annulment is proving that there wasn't any marriage that took place at all.Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-47719073749743136982009-02-21T22:34:00.001-08:002009-02-24T02:31:53.089-08:00LOOKING FOR CHILD CUSTODY ATTORNEY?Are you scared of losing your child right after the divorce or annulment case? Are you a single father or mother who is combating for Child Custody? Winning on this Child Custody Fight is within reach… <br /><br />My lawyer is also handling child custody case… so keep your child safe with you, do something essential move/action to fight for your rights. Prove to them that you deserve to have your child back to you. <br /><br />Child Custody Attorney is all you need to get back the most precious person in your life... your child.Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-11627504892890753502009-02-19T22:20:00.000-08:002009-02-19T22:36:01.963-08:00IF I MARRIED TWICE IN THE PHILIPPINES,DOES THE TWO MARRIAGES RECORDED IN NSO?Yes... The two marriages if recorded properly in the city or municipality will absolutely appear in NSO. If your lawful spouse is still living in your initial marriage with no annulment, then you are legally responsible of the second marriage for BIGAMY (male). Your spouse in hypothetically second marriage can be charged for ADULTERY (female) also. Marrying twice or more (POLYGAMY) is considered Criminal Case by Law.Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6446879587616018800.post-15571436675955264352009-02-17T19:41:00.000-08:002009-02-17T19:54:41.786-08:00WORRY FREE AND FAST ANNULMENT RESULTAre YOU looking for <em><strong>Worry Free and Fast Annulment</strong></em> Result? You know where to go... I can really help you find the best Lawyer in Town. <br /><br />So stop worrying about the Past where you could really make a step forward and start a new LIFE with the One you truly Love… your Soul mate is just roaming around. Look for the best Partner in Life as still there is a new hope for everyone.<br /><br /><em><strong>Everybody Deserves to be Happy!</strong></em>Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01983597277385881657noreply@blogger.com6